The in-reply-to didn't seem to work out, but this traces back to https://ffmpeg.org//pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-December/318226.html
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 4:18 PM Marth64 <mart...@proxyid.net> wrote: > Thanks all, this should be much better now. > > Signed-off-by: Marth64 <mart...@proxyid.net> > --- > doc/filters.texi | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi > index 09fa3264ea..20c91bab3a 100644 > --- a/doc/filters.texi > +++ b/doc/filters.texi > @@ -15968,6 +15968,15 @@ further computations. This allows inserting the > idet filter as a low computation > method to clean up the interlaced flag > @end table > > +@subsection Examples > + > +Inspect the field order of the first 360 frames in a video, in verbose > detail: > +@example > +ffmpeg -i INPUT -filter:v idet,metadata=mode=print -frames:v 360 -an -f > null - > +@end example > +The idet filter will add analysis metadata to each frame, which will then > be > +discarded. At the end, the filter will also print a final report with > statistics. > + > @section il > > Deinterleave or interleave fields. > -- > 2.34.1 > > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
