Kindly disregard. This is not actually a typo, it is valid regional English. Sorry. Just ignore this one.
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 4:51 PM Marth64 <mart...@proxyid.net> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marth64 <mart...@proxyid.net> > --- > doc/filters.texi | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi > index f4084ff494..eff2256fef 100644 > --- a/doc/filters.texi > +++ b/doc/filters.texi > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ filtergraph, a link between the corresponding input > and output pad is > created. > > If an output pad is not labelled, it is linked by default to the first > -unlabelled input pad of the next filter in the filterchain. > +unlabeled input pad of the next filter in the filterchain. > For example in the filterchain > @example > nullsrc, split[L1], [L2]overlay, nullsink > @@ -204,13 +204,13 @@ the split filter instance has two output pads, and > the overlay filter > instance two input pads. The first output pad of split is labelled > "L1", the first input pad of overlay is labelled "L2", and the second > output pad of split is linked to the second input pad of overlay, > -which are both unlabelled. > +which are both unlabeled. > > In a filter description, if the input label of the first filter is not > specified, "in" is assumed; if the output label of the last filter is not > specified, "out" is assumed. > > -In a complete filterchain all the unlabelled filter input and output > +In a complete filterchain all the unlabeled filter input and output > pads must be connected. A filtergraph is considered valid if all the > filter input and output pads of all the filterchains are connected. > > -- > 2.34.1 > > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
