Le 1 décembre 2023 09:55:15 GMT+02:00, "Martin Storsjö" <mar...@martin.st> a écrit : >On Fri, 1 Dec 2023, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > >> Le 30 novembre 2023 23:13:59 GMT+02:00, "Martin Storsjö" <mar...@martin.st> >> a écrit : >>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: >> >>>> In other words, is publishing on the FATE website worth making the tests >>>> coverage and/or the build time worse? >>> >>> By making the test coverage worse, you mean if I'd be doing the full >>> testing of many combinations already, and I'd stop doing that in order to >>> do this lesser testing instead? If I'd be doing it (I currently don't) I >>> guess that would be my concern, not others? >> >> No. The point is that this is adding a small hack that works for one >> specific case for a short while (testing Armv8 IMM8 and DP), but is known >> not to be sufficient anyway (for SVE, PAuth, RVV, etc). > >I'll reiterate the question from the bottom of the mail, that you didn't >respond to. > >Would you be ok with a setup, where a FATE instance optionally can run a >subset of tests instead of the full suite, but run them multiple times with >e.g. different QEMU settings? That would allow repeating checkasm for all the >interesting cases - and if one really wanted to spend a lot of CPU time on it, >also could run the full FATE suite in all those configurations.
Being able to run tests under a different runner/wrapper or the same runner with different settings, would be a lot more viable, indeed IMO > >// Martin >_______________________________________________ >ffmpeg-devel mailing list >ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > >To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
