Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-11-12 18:14:09) > On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 07:25:13PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > In other words, you are deliberately trying to subvert the > > intent of the rules. > > no, the GA can change the rules entirely if it wants. > I can change neither the rules nor the GA. I can propose > 20 people and the GA can tell me no an all.
Sure, the GA can change the rules through a collective decision. But then if you want the rules changed, you should propose a vote on such a change, not start disregarding the rules you do not like. Though given that the option you proposed that would preserve the voting rights for inactive developers was defeated by a large margin in the vote we just had, it seems to me that most of the community does not share your opinion. > > > > Also, you have just implied that people disagreeing with you are > > unthinking zombies driven by their subconscious insticts. That is a VERY > > rude thing to say about someone. > > you are accusing me of something here that i have not said and not meant. What you said, literally: > This seems a fundamental, unconcious and instinctive reaction humans have. > I called it Xenophobia, cuz it seemed like a similar concept. > Do you disagree ? (not about the term but this sort of behavior is happenin In other words, you are saying that people who disagree with you must be doing so for unconscious and/or instinctive reasons, rather than as a deliberate consciously thought-out choice. > psychology is not about > "unthinking zombies driven by their subconscious insticts" > > "Psychology is the study of mind and behavior in humans and non-humans. > Psychology includes the study of conscious and unconscious phenomena, > including feelings and thoughts." > Maybe it was a bad idea to discuss psychology during a already > heated mail thread. Discussing psychology in the abstract is a fine campfire topic, but totally off-topic on this ML and especially so in this thread. Speculating on psychological processes of actual specific people * in a public forum * without their consent * with whom you currently resolving a serious disagrement is EXTREMELY inappropriate and rude. Please never do that again. Anyway, it seems to me that this thread has exhausted itself. As I said previously in this thread - I do not object to your proposing whomever you like, as long as the people in question actively agree to being on the ballot. I will expect you to send a list of these people before next Friday. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
