Le perjantaina 27. lokakuuta 2023, 19.05.51 EEST Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > This is about the funding organisation(s) and the recipient developer(s) > > in > > need of sustainable funding. While my income is public (if you know where > > to look), I sincerely doubt that many people *here* would want theirs > > published. I rather think that they would see it as a major intrusion to > > their privacy. > > > > I too prefer standard specifications and source code open, but this is > > about people's personal information, not source code. Whether you like it > > or not, that really is a *downside* of going through the mailing list or > > the GA, simply because it is a major turn-off. > > Isnt this the same for all options of full time payment we have ?
> Consider FFlabs, you can look at who is being paid by FFlabs, its being > mentioned in various places. > Then look at what these people do, so you know what they are paid for. I don't know if FFlabs publishes the payments it makes to its consultants, so I can't answer your question. But it sounds odd, as I would expect that that would violate privacy laws. All FFlabs seems to publish is who their consultants are, not what they work on or for. > It may give the impression of more privacy but iam not sure it really > is that much more private. In most countries, individual income is more or less confidential while business contracts have business secrecy. Even here, I know at least one of my colleagues has applied to have their taxable income delisted on the basis of GDPR. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
