Quoting James Almer (2023-10-10 13:58:00) > On 10/10/2023 8:54 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting James Almer (2023-10-10 13:44:19) > >> On 10/10/2023 8:17 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > >>> Quoting James Almer (2023-10-07 18:24:56) > >>>> This is a simple set to add support to stream wide, container level > >>>> cropping > >>>> parameters, as featured in formats like Matroska and ISOBMFF. It's > >>>> needed for > >>>> things like AV1 streams generated by certain hardware encoders that > >>>> produce > >>>> dimension aligned output, and unlike H26x, can't export cropping info > >>>> within > >>>> the bitstream. > >>>> In this set i add the packet side data type, mux and demux support to > >>>> Matroska, > >>>> and handling code to ffmpeg and ffplay. Missing is support for clap > >>>> boxes in > >>>> ISOBMFF, and exporting the relevant side data from encoders like AMF. > >>>> > >>>> It's a rebased and updated version to the set i sent a month ago. > >>> > >>> Why is there no lavc-decoder handling? I would expect cropping side data > >>> submitted to lavc to be somehow propagated to decoded frames. > >>> Though there is a question of how to combine side data with the > >>> codec-level cropping. > >> > >> I thought about adding lavc support alongside the CLI handling, yeah. > >> And it should be a matter of adding the values to the existing ones in > >> frame->crop_* as exported by decoders, which av_frame_apply_cropping() > >> will then handle. > >> > >> And the reason i add support to the CLI by including a filter instead of > >> leaving it up to lavc is that av_frame_apply_cropping() may not do exact > >> cropping if AV_CODEC_FLAG_UNALIGNED is not set. > > > > I intend to have the CLI always set AVCodecContext.apply_cropping=0 and > > have it handled by lavfi for this exact reason, just didn't get to > > actually doing it yet. Feel free and welcome to do it yourself. > > The cropping filter doesn't look at the frame cropping fields, though. > It in fact exports cropping into them if you pass it hw frames. It only > looks at input arguments. So it doesn't seem like that can be done > without changing the filter.
I mean ffmpeg CLI would look at the frame cropping fields and insert the crop filter accordingly, as it does for other bits of metadata. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".