Le keskiviikkona 4. lokakuuta 2023, 17.23.12 EEST Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > Why are you part of a community project if you don't believe the > > community is capable of running a project? > > Questioning why some developer is part of FFmpeg is IMHO a violation of > the Code of Conduct. No matter how it is worded
Kieran was asking a very valid *question*. NG has been vocally adamant (to put it mildly) about turning FFmpeg into (or back into) a place for fun experimentation and innovation, without the burden of reverse dependencies, down-stream packagers, users, and contributors with business interests. In the past year, I have not noticed anybody else support those directions. Your own (in)actions have been in direct contradiction with his stated views, for instance: - You keep making tons of "boring" fixes from OSS fuzz findings and other sources (I am thankful for your continued efforts on the first point, by the way; this is not meant as negative criticism). - You are listed as a prominent member of FFlabs (and you have not denounced that in any way). Admittedly, Kieran's question could be taken as loaded, but TBH the question seems valid, and calling it a violation of the CoC is too much of a stretch for me. > > Why not start your own project like TempleOS where you can do what you > > want? > are you suggesting that we all move to a system where every developer has > her/his own fork and they get merged ? He is suggesting that if one person *appears* to be alone in wanting to take (or take back) FFmpeg in the given directions that they advocate, they should consider starting their own project or fork. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".