On 9/29/2023 8:19 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Fixes: signed integer overflow: 64 + 9223372036854775803 cannot be represented 
in type 'long long'
Fixes: 
51896/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_dem_CAF_fuzzer-6536881135550464

Found-by: continuous fuzzing process 
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
---
  libavformat/cafdec.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libavformat/cafdec.c b/libavformat/cafdec.c
index e92e3279fc6..0e50a3cfe68 100644
--- a/libavformat/cafdec.c
+++ b/libavformat/cafdec.c
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int read_packet(AVFormatContext *s, AVPacket *pkt)
/* don't read past end of data chunk */
      if (caf->data_size > 0) {
-        left = (caf->data_start + caf->data_size) - avio_tell(pb);
+        left = av_sat_add64(caf->data_start, caf->data_size) - avio_tell(pb);

avio_tell(pb) here is guaranteed to be bigger than caf->data_start, which is the offset where the DATA chunk starts, so the result of this calculation will be <= INT64_MAX even if you don't saturate it and instead cast it to uint64_t. Nonetheless, if the DATA chunk ends at an offset that would not fit in an int64_t, then we can't parse it to begin with due to AVIOContext API limitations.

Maybe we should just abort in read_header() if data_start + data_size > INT64_MAX, instead of pretending we can parse the file, invalid or not, by saturating values.

          if (!left)
              return AVERROR_EOF;
          if (left < 0)
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to