On 9/24/23, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-09-24): >> Define 'works'. >> >> It is clearly sub-optimal. > > Many users use it for many different tasks and it serves them > efficiently. > > There are probably ways to enhance the API of libavdevice. If you have > suggestions, then please share them. But when you say that libavdevices > is “abusing libavformat”, it seems to indicate you completely missed the > fact that being able to use devices in places that were not designed is > an essential part of the service libavdevice gives to users, and if your > suggestions involve breaking it you can keep them to yourself, they are > useless.
Citations needed. > > As for people who criticize libavdevice without even a hint of a > reflection on how to make make it better, they are just hypocrites who > disguise their hate into technical opinion. libavdevice have no API. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
