Hello Hendrik, The harm of hard-coded alignment 32 that typical 1280x720 progressive video should be encoded as 1280x736. I.e. absolutely superfluous stripe of macroblocks should be encoded. I can see that CODEC_FLAG_INTERLACED_DCT currently checks into dnxhddata.c dnxhdenc.c dvenc.c libx264.c libxavs.c mpegvideo_enc.c nvenc.c Why it can not be used by similar way in qsvenc.c?
Saturday, July 4, 2015, 4:34:32 PM, you wrote: HL> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Ivan Uskov <ivan.us...@nablet.com> wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> There is patch which fixes too strong frame height rounding for case >> when progressive frame sequence encodes by QSV. HL> Is there any harm in always using 32 alignment for the height? HL> Because the flag you are checking there is not correct. In fact, there HL> is no reliable global interlaced flag. -- Best regards, Ivan mailto:ivan.us...@nablet.com _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
