On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:13 AM Zhao Zhili <quinkbl...@foxmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Jun Zhao > > Sent: 2023年8月31日 22:50 > > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > Cc: Jun Zhao <barryjz...@tencent.com>; Jun Zhao <mypopy...@gmail.com> > > Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] lavc/videotoolboxenc: enable > > low-latency mode for HEVC > > > > Enable the HEVC encoder that supports low-latency mode. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jun Zhao <barryjz...@tencent.com> > > --- > > libavcodec/videotoolboxenc.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/videotoolboxenc.c b/libavcodec/videotoolboxenc.c > > index 8e493c4f7a..bfc03787a0 100644 > > --- a/libavcodec/videotoolboxenc.c > > +++ b/libavcodec/videotoolboxenc.c > > @@ -1568,7 +1568,8 @@ static int vtenc_configure_encoder(AVCodecContext > > *avctx) > > #endif > > > > // low-latency mode: eliminate frame reordering, follow a > > one-in-one-out encoding mode > > - if ((avctx->flags & AV_CODEC_FLAG_LOW_DELAY) && avctx->codec_id == > > AV_CODEC_ID_H264) { > > + if ((avctx->flags & AV_CODEC_FLAG_LOW_DELAY) && > > + (avctx->codec_id == AV_CODEC_ID_H264 || avctx->codec_id == > > AV_CODEC_ID_HEVC)) { > > How about just remove the codec_id check? > Is there any unwelcome side effects for encoders other than H264/HEVC?
1. One reason is that there are now other encoders available, such as prores_videotoolbox. 2. It may be more appropriate to use a strictly qualified check instead of an open condition. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".