On Thu, 6 Jul 2023, 08:52 Anton Khirnov, <an...@khirnov.net> wrote: > > We are not claiming that. We are claiming that the random numbers > generated are (to the best of our ability, and that of the underlying > libraries we rely on) cryptographically secure. This means suitable for > use in state of the art cryptographic algorithms like AES. > I do not think it makes sense to mistrust CSPRNGs, yet still trust AES.
Agreed, I don't think it's ffmpeg's job to get into a philosophical discussion about the state of the art of random number generation. Kieran > ". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
