Quoting Paul B Mahol (2023-06-14 18:53:52) > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 6:51 PM Anton Khirnov <an...@khirnov.net> wrote: > > > Nothing useful can be done with them currently. > > --- > > fftools/ffmpeg_filter.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fftools/ffmpeg_filter.c b/fftools/ffmpeg_filter.c > > index 4f7565e44e..54c7ed1f5c 100644 > > --- a/fftools/ffmpeg_filter.c > > +++ b/fftools/ffmpeg_filter.c > > @@ -845,6 +845,12 @@ FilterGraph *fg_create(char *graph_desc) > > ofilter->name = describe_filter_link(fg, cur, 0); > > } > > > > + if (!fg->nb_outputs) { > > + av_log(fg, AV_LOG_FATAL, "A filtergraph has zero outputs, this is > > not supported\n"); > > + ret = AVERROR(ENOSYS); > > + goto fail; > > + } > > + > > fail: > > avfilter_inout_free(&inputs); > > avfilter_inout_free(&outputs); > > -- > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > NAK > > This is functionality breaking change. >
Exactly what useful functionality is broken by this? > And why something that is currently supported should be not supported any > more. It is not really supported. The scheduling logic is based around output streams and cannot work without them. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".