On 5/21/23, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/21/2023 5:02 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 5/21/23, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 5/21/2023 4:25 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>>> On 5/21/23, Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Attached patches. >>>>> >>>>> This finally removes giant hacks in gif demuxer and allows using gif >>>>> files via pipe reliably. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Better patches attached, no more sets time_base in gif parser. >>> >>> Samples report 100fps now. >> >> gif is VFR, and that is max fps it supports. > > But none of these samples are 100fps, and the fate ref changes look like > you made them all CFR 100fps, with a lot of duplicated frames to achieve > that where required.
Because no muxer supports VFR. And current demuxer even drops some frames. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
