On 4/29/2023 9:17 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > What important problem within the scope of the project is being solved > by this? Why do we need over a 1000 lines of just new header files for > it? Why do we need a generic JSON writer? We are not a JSON library. > Neither are we a string processing library.
I agree, I don't think it has a place in a set of multimedia libraries. If I wanted this functionality there are many other good libaries I could use that also don't pull in a multimeia framework. > IMO this should not go in until and unless significant practical > benefits of this code are shown on a non-toy use case within the scope > of our project. Having watched this from afar for a while it seems like a classic FOSS problem: One person may have infinite energy to argue ther point / idea until nobody can be bothered to reply anymore since it is so draining. Happy Coronation, - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
