Am 28.02.23 um 18:12 schrieb Werner Robitza:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 2:16 PM Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de> wrote:
Am 28.02.23 um 14:13 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
Am 28.02.23 um 12:42 schrieb Werner Robitza:
The filter implements the 'legacy' version from a superseded recommendation.
---
doc/filters.texi | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi
index 47e92b9269..25574cd55c 100644
--- a/doc/filters.texi
+++ b/doc/filters.texi
@@ -21593,9 +21593,11 @@ ffmpeg -i input1.mkv -i input2.mkv -filter_complex
"[0:v][1:v] signature=nb_inpu
@anchor{siti}
@section siti
-Calculate Spatial Info (SI) and Temporal Info (TI) scores for a video, as
defined
-in ITU-T P.910: Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia
-applications. Available PDF at
@url{https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.910-199909-S/en }.
+Calculate Spatial Information (SI) and Temporal Information (TI) scores for a
video,
+as defined in ITU-T Rec. P.910 (11/21): Subjective video quality assessment
methods
+for multimedia applications. Available PDF at
@url{https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.910-202111-S/en}.
+Note that this is a legacy implementation that corresponds to a superseded
recommendation.
+Refer to ITU-T Rec. P.910 (07/22) for the latest version.
It accepts the following option:
Ok.
You might want to add the URL of the current spec, though:
https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.910-202207-I/en
Sure, patch attached.
Looks better but wait - why did you change the implemented version from 09/99
to 11/21 in the first place?
(Does this not even make it more wrong?)
-Thilo
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
