Hi Caleb, Tomas et al., I have been experimenting with combining the HTJ2K patchset [1] and the J2K test patchset [2]:
(a) neither valgrind nor the fuzzer seem to complain (b) there are code style/cosmetic issues (c) the HTJ2K block decoder does not yet support placeholder passes [3], which are not necessarily present I do not think that (c) is a blocker and recommend that we plan on merging the combined patchset once the code style/cosmetic issues are fixed. The idea is to have a baseline from which performance and feature set can be improved. Any major concerns with this plan? I am happy to take a stab at cleaning up the code, unless someone wishes to do it. Best, -- Pierre [1] https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?series=8117 [2] https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?series=8108 [3] https://ds.jpeg.org/documents/jpeg2000/wg1n100431-098-COM-Guidelines_on_Packet_Parsing_and_Construction_for_HTJ2K.pdf _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
