tis 2023-02-21 klockan 12:30 +0000 skrev Nicolas Gaullier: > > This is why it is better to demand that these things be explicitly > > signalled. At the same time a lot of users expect ffmpeg to Just > > Work, but that is not always possible. Perhaps we should should put > > this in the manual and tell >spdif/s377m/dolby-e users to RTFM? > > > > > And another point here in this latest edition on my patch serie > > > is > > > that the use of an existing AVOption makes it possible for users > > > to > > > upgrade their command lines just now by adding the option : > > > ignored in previous version, it will take effect the day they > > > upgrade > > > their ffmpeg version, so the transition can be smooth... > > > > Assuming users read the documentation of course.. > > Yes, definitely, at the end, I don't see an option other than RTFM. > Documentation : I could insert a "dolby_e" section between ac3 and > flac in decoders.texi. > But there is nothing specific to dolby_e for real. > Maybe an overall "stream probing" chapter would be better in > decoders.texi between "Decoders" and "Video Decoders" chapters; with > a specific paragraph about the non_pcm_mode option for wav/s337 (and > later for s302) ?
Hmm. Perhaps. This also touches demuxers to an extent, so perhaps a section for wavdec with a link to the dolby-e section in the decoder documentation in that case? /Tomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
