On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:33 PM Marvin Scholz <epira...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Alternatively, we could just not have an instability period at all. > > > > Not having any instability period at all seems like a bad idea. >
Actually that sounds like the best idea. You would just have to prepare the bump in a branch and all unstable changes ready to merge in an instant. Miss it? Tough. Having months long periods so people can get their stuff sorted is way too long. Ideally it should be prepared ahead of time and only a "soft instability" period of maybe two weeks reserved for bug fixes (don't want to sit on issues for ever), rather then big changes or new features. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
