> On Jan 10, 2023, at 21:37, Tomas Härdin <g...@haerdin.se> wrote: > > tis 2023-01-10 klockan 19:35 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili: >> From: Zhao Zhili <zhiliz...@tencent.com> >> >> --- >> v3: when target API <= 24 ==> when target API < 24 >> v2: add comments >> >> libavcodec/mediacodecdec.c | 8 +++++++- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/mediacodecdec.c b/libavcodec/mediacodecdec.c >> index 11f655a9aa..21464900d1 100644 >> --- a/libavcodec/mediacodecdec.c >> +++ b/libavcodec/mediacodecdec.c >> @@ -415,7 +415,13 @@ static av_cold int >> mediacodec_decode_init(AVCodecContext *avctx) >> s->ctx->codec_name, ret); >> >> sdk_int = ff_Build_SDK_INT(avctx); >> - if (sdk_int <= 23 && >> + /* ff_Build_SDK_INT can fail when target API < 24 and JVM isn't >> available. >> + * If we don't check sdk_int > 0, the workaround might be >> enabled by >> + * mistake. >> + * JVM is required to make the workaround works reliably. On the >> other hand, >> + * missing a workaround should not be a serious issue, we do as >> best we can. >> + */ >> + if (sdk_int > 0 && sdk_int <= 23 && >> strcmp(s->ctx->codec_name, >> "OMX.amlogic.mpeg2.decoder.awesome") == 0) { >> av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_INFO, "Enabling workaround for %s on >> API=%d\n", >> s->ctx->codec_name, sdk_int); > > Looks OK
Patchset pushed, thanks for the review. > > /Tomas > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".