Camille Oudot (12023-01-04): > So does it still makes sense to have a patch to pass through a RTP > "reuseaddr" option to the underlying UDP URL "reuse" option?
Yes, totally. But let us make it the right way: not just add this option and forward code, but correctly set up the objects so that all options are forwarded as necessary. See libavfilter/framesync.h for an example of code that does this. > Documenting the good use cases of course (although I'd start using it > for the wrong use case ;-)). If yes I'll resubmit the patch. Having several instances of ffmpeg / ffplay / whatever receive the same stream seems like a valid use case. > I'm still planning to have a look on a proper (e.g using only one > shared socket) implementation of rtcp-mux (easy one, I already have a > PoC working) and RTP Bundle (tougher one). Please. I suspect cheating with SO_REUSEADDR would not have been more straightforward anyway: the demuxer for each individual stream would have received the packets for all streams and would have to be taught to distinguish. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
