>Marvin Scholz (12022-12-19):
> I agree, but then the docs should probably mention that to not give a
>> false sense of absolute security here. And maybe note that it might
>Indeed, documentation is necessary.
Is it appropriate to describe this document? Please give some suggestions.
Thank you , everyone.
fftools-common-opts.texi
@item -mask_url -i @var{url} (@emph{output})
If the protocol address contains the user name and password, the ps -ef
command exposes plaintext. The -mask_url parameter option is added to
replace the protocol address in the command line with the asterisk (*).
Because other users can run the ps -ef command to view sensitive
information such as the user name and password in the protocol address,
which is insecure.
@example
ffmpeg -mask_url -i rtsp://username:password-ip:port/stream/test
@end example
>> be a better option to pass the password via stdin or hide the process
>> from other users to completely avoid leaking the password.
>Unfortunately, as far as I know, we do not have any mechanism of the kind.
>That would be useful.
>Regards,
--
> Nicolas George
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with
subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
