On 2022-12-02 06:16 am, Chris Ribble wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:51 PM Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote:
Can you explain why those files are considered valid, or why it makes
sense to generate such files?
Thanks,
Marton
As far as I can tell, the file that a user provided with this problem
was generated by an encoder (running FFmpeg 3.4) that started writing
zero-sized samples when their video switcher + capture card stopped
receiving audio input. I'm not arguing that it's good for files to be
generated like this, but it's nice for FFmpeg to be able to process
them all the same (i.e. the robustness principle).
With this patch reverted, FFmpeg can accept an input file that is
partially broken (with playback anomalies due to the presence of
zero-sized samples) and produce a valid, working output mp4 (or DASH
stream), just like it could in release 5.0 and older.
One of the best things about FFmpeg is that it can fix invalid
container metadata. I feel like losing that capability for this
scenario is a regression.
FWIW, we don't discard regular MP4s with sample entries of 0 in stts,
which is only permitted for the last solo sample in a track. So, I agree.
Regards,
Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
