> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Nicolas George
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 5:40 PM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] doc/developer.texi: extend
> the argument for submitting patches
>
> Soft Works (12022-11-14):
> > What are your points? Which are your objections? Please show the
> > code that you think is wrong and say how it should be done instead.
>
> For the record, I have, multiple times.
You’ve been destructive from the very first moment when you realized
that I was going to do something that you had been planning for a
long time.
You haven't missed a single occasion to discredit me or my work,
keeping it vague just like Anton does right now, to keep things at
a level where credibility weighs - instead than a technical facts.
Ah, wait - there's one occasion where you never jumped on, never
mentioned, talked about or objected:
The separate subtitle timing fields. You know exactly why I have
them and why these are needed, but you would rather bite your
tongue than saying it, and so you kept quiet each time when others
were criticizing it.
Now you'll have to say that I'm wrong.
I'm curious how you'll say it.
PS: I'm sorry that I got in your way, I understood that much
later only. It was just that I needed this functionality,
not that I would have had a choice.
Thanks,
softworkz
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
