Hi, I preferred to check instead for HAVE_X86ASM, as those checks would only hit on either a missing or crippled NASM. Moreover, the EXTERNAL_<arch> macros do both the HAVE_<arch>_EXTERNAL and the runtime CPU flag check. The former of which would become redundant and duplicated with your suggestion.
Should I move forward anyway with it? On 03/11/2022 12:55, dev at lynne.ee (Lynne) wrote: > Nov 3, 2022, 16:30 by amy at amyspark.me: > >> Continuation of 40e6575aa3eed64cd32bf28c00ae57edc5acb25a >> >> Signed-off-by: L. E. Segovia <> amy at amyspark.me> > >> > > Wrong way to fix it. Makefile to prevent compilation + ifdef guards > on all arch-specific init function calls. > -- amyspark 🌸 https://www.amyspark.me _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
