On Sun, 9 Oct 2022, reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de wrote:
From: Reimar Döffinger <reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de>
Currently it is done in several different ways, which
might cause needless dependencies or in case of
tx_float_neon.S is incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger <reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de>
---
libavcodec/aarch64/fft_neon.S | 3 +-
libavcodec/aarch64/h264idct_neon.S | 6 +-
libavcodec/aarch64/hevcdsp_sao_neon.S | 3 +-
libavcodec/aarch64/mdct_neon.S | 18 ++----
libavcodec/aarch64/me_cmp_neon.S | 6 +-
libavcodec/aarch64/synth_filter_neon.S | 3 +-
libavcodec/aarch64/vp9itxfm_neon.S | 28 ++++-----
libavcodec/aarch64/vp9lpf_16bpp_neon.S | 32 +++++------
libavcodec/aarch64/vp9lpf_neon.S | 80 +++++++++++++-------------
libavutil/aarch64/tx_float_neon.S | 52 ++++++++---------
10 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
This looks reasonable to me, assuming that it passes fate. Do you want to
push it yourself, or do you want me to do it?
// Martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
