On 9/16/22, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <p...@sandflow.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 4:07 PM Lynne <d...@lynne.ee> wrote: >> >> Sep 16, 2022, 00:46 by p...@sandflow.com: >> >> > From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <p...@palemieux.com> >> > >> > --- >> > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> > index ed2ec0b90c..2d37f0b86a 100644 >> > --- a/MAINTAINERS >> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> > @@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ Muxers/Demuxers: >> > idcin.c Mike Melanson >> > idroqdec.c Mike Melanson >> > iff.c Jaikrishnan Menon >> > + imf* Pierre-Anthony Lemieux >> > img2*.c Michael Niedermayer >> > ipmovie.c Mike Melanson >> > ircam* Paul B Mahol >> > @@ -633,6 +634,7 @@ Nikolay Aleksandrov 8978 1D8C FB71 588E >> > 4B27 EAA8 C4F0 B5FC E011 13B1 >> > Panagiotis Issaris 6571 13A3 33D9 3726 F728 AA98 F643 B12E >> > ECF3 E029 >> > Peter Ross A907 E02F A6E5 0CD2 34CD 20D2 6760 79C5 >> > AC40 DD6B >> > Philip Langdale 5DC5 8D66 5FBA 3A43 18EC 045E F8D6 B194 >> > 6A75 682E >> > +Pierre-Anthony Lemieux (pal) F4B3 9492 E6F2 E4AF AEC8 46CB 698F A1F0 >> > F8D4 EED4 >> > Ramiro Polla 7859 C65B 751B 1179 792E DAE8 8E95 8B2F >> > 9B6C 5700 >> > Reimar Doeffinger C61D 16E5 9E2C D10C 8958 38A4 0899 A2B9 >> > 06D4 D9C7 >> > Reinhard Tartler 9300 5DC2 7E87 6C37 ED7B CA9A 9808 3544 >> > 9453 48A4 >> > >> >> That list is for those with push access. Are you sure you want that? > > You make it sound unpleasant :) > > In all seriousness, my objective is being responsive to issues filed > against the IMF demuxer. > > I am happy to set aside the time to be a maintainer if it helps > achieve that objective. > > I am also happy to not be a maintainer if it will not help. > >> We don't have strict requirements for that, but you're just past >> the #commits to get a vote on TC questions. >> Reviewing patches takes a while, but that's just how it is when >> they're of little interest to most. > > Yes. > > Isn't this particularly true when there is no maintainer for that > module -- as is currently the case for the IMF demuxer? > > On a related note, I would think that review of narrow bug fixes like > [1] would require relatively less time than, say, the addition of an > imf muxer. > > [1] https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?series=7416 > > In any case thanks for your help/input since the beginning of my > involvement with the codebase.
Just ask someone to push patches more frequently on ML and on IRC. > >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
