On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:07:17PM -0600, ill wrote: > So can the ffserver patch be committed? > > > >
> ffserver.c | 4 ++++ > ffserver_config.c | 6 ++++-- > ffserver_config.h | 1 + > libavformat/allformats.c | 1 + > libavformat/rawenc.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > cd08a86e251ccc0e104a7719ec1e686028d0580c 0001-ffserver-jpg-patch.patch > From 5b681fdaf7971f841b84cfe06412c67ba417fb00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Caligula useraccount <calig...@sarijopen.student.utwente.nl> > Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:42:42 -0600 > Subject: [PATCH] ffserver jpg patch split, cleaned up and applied thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
