Hi,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:38 AM Andreas Rheinhardt <
andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Peter Ross:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 03:07:13AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> >> It is a VP8-only feature.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com>
> >> ---
> >> libavcodec/vp8.c | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/vp8.c b/libavcodec/vp8.c
> >> index c00c5c975e..04a2113cc8 100644
> >> --- a/libavcodec/vp8.c
> >> +++ b/libavcodec/vp8.c
> >> @@ -637,7 +637,6 @@ static int vp7_decode_frame_header(VP8Context *s,
> const uint8_t *buf, int buf_si
> >> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> >> memcpy(s->prob->mvc[i], vp7_mv_default_prob[i],
> >> sizeof(vp7_mv_default_prob[i]));
> >> - memset(&s->lf_delta, 0, sizeof(s->lf_delta));
> >> memcpy(s->prob[0].scan, ff_zigzag_scan,
> sizeof(s->prob[0].scan));
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -2171,7 +2170,7 @@ void filter_level_for_mb(VP8Context *s,
> VP8Macroblock *mb,
> >> } else
> >> filter_level = s->filter.level;
> >>
> >> - if (s->lf_delta.enabled) {
> >> + if (!is_vp7 && s->lf_delta.enabled) {
> >> filter_level += s->lf_delta.ref[mb->ref_frame];
> >> filter_level += s->lf_delta.mode[mb->mode];
> >> }
> >
> > what's the motivation for patches 01 and 02?
> > are you not just adding another condition (is_vp7) to evaluate at decode
> time?
> > if its improved readability, then suggest renaming 'lf_delta' to
> 'lf_delta_vp8'
> >
> > pathces 3-18 look fine to me.
> >
>
> is_vp7 is evaluated at compile-time
>
This should probably be changed to be uppercase then. Lowercase suggests
it's a variable.
Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
