Alan Kelly:
> ---
> libswscale/x86/swscale.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libswscale/x86/swscale.c b/libswscale/x86/swscale.c
> index 32d441245d..881a4b7798 100644
> --- a/libswscale/x86/swscale.c
> +++ b/libswscale/x86/swscale.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void yuv2yuvX_ ##opt(const int16_t *filter, int
> filterSize, \
> if(pixelsProcessed > 0) \
> ff_yuv2yuvX_ ##opt(filter, filterSize - 1, 0, dest - offset,
> pixelsProcessed + offset, dither, offset); \
> if(remainder > 0){ \
> - ff_yuv2yuvX_mmx(filter, filterSize - 1, pixelsProcessed, dest -
> offset, pixelsProcessed + remainder + offset, dither, offset); \
> + ff_yuv2yuvX_mmxext(filter, filterSize - 1, pixelsProcessed, dest -
> offset, pixelsProcessed + remainder + offset, dither, offset); \
> } \
> return; \
> }
What about the call to yuv2yuvX_mmx() in line 208 of this macro? Can it
not also be replaced by yuv2yuvX_mmxext()?
- Andreas
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
