Quoting Thilo Borgmann (2022-08-16 20:48:57) > Am 16.08.22 um 16:10 schrieb Anton Khirnov: > > Quoting Thilo Borgmann (2022-08-15 22:02:09) > >> $subject > >> > >> -Thilo > >> From fe2ff114cb004f897c7774753d9cf28298eba82d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: =?UTF-8?q?Jan=20Ekstr=C3=B6m?= <jee...@gmail.com> > >> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 21:09:27 +0200 > >> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] ffmpeg: Add display_matrix option > >> > >> This enables overriding the rotation as well as horizontal/vertical > >> flip state of a specific video stream on the input side. > >> > >> Additionally, switch the singular test that was utilizing the rotation > >> metadata to instead override the input display rotation, thus leading > >> to the same result. > >> --- > > > > I still don't see how it's better to squash multiple options into a > > single option. > > > > It requires all this extra infrastructure and in the end it's less > > user-friendly, because user-understandable things like rotation or flips > > are now hidden under "display matrix". How many users would know what a > > display matrix is? > > FWIW I think Gyan's request to do this all in one option that effect one > thing (the display matrix) is valid.
I don't. It may be one thing internally, but modeling user interfaces based on internal representation is a sinful malpractice. More importantly, I see no advantage from doing it - it only makes the option parsing more complicated. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
