On 8/11/2022 6:56 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote: > This is just your - valued! - opinion, but still just 1. I insist on > waiting to hear from Michael to hear a decision on this, mainly because he > was quite persistent in asking for this feature to begin with. > The risks were clear and - somewhat - mentioned in the post I linked to > before yet the decision was still to proceed.
This is a bigger issue than a single person's opinion - it's just plainly an unacceptable risk. I totally agree with Timo here. 'Just works' isn't an acceptbale reason to ship a hard coded third party sever as part of a widely used FOS library and tool. I admit I was large absent from the original (many) rounds or review, but I'm kind of surprised it was merged as-is, to be honest. Frankly either it should've been merged as "batteries not included", or should have been a whole IPFS implementation. However, regardless of how this came to be (whether reasonable or not), this should be removed. -Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
