On 11.07.2022 16:26, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Henrik Gramner:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:19 AM Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st> wrote:
+#if (AV_GCC_VERSION_AT_LEAST(4,0) || defined(__clang__)) && (defined(__ELF__) 
|| defined(__MACH__))
+#    define av_visibility_hidden __attribute__((visibility("hidden")))
+#else
+#    define av_visibility_hidden
+#endif

The usual approach is to compile with -fvisibility=hidden and
explicitly flag exported API symbols.

Is there a reason for doing this the other way around?

-fvisibility=hidden only affects the visibility of symbols defined in
the currently compiled translation unit. It does not allow the compiler
to make assumptions about external declarations that are used in this
translation unit (in other words, it has to presume the worst: That it
comes from a different DSO). E.g. this is ff_rdft_end on 32bit x86 if
ff_fft_end is declared with an explicit hidden attribute:

000000bb <ff_rdft_end>:

   bb:  83 44 24 04 18          addl   $0x18,0x4(%esp)

   c0:  e9 fc ff ff ff          jmp    c1 <ff_rdft_end+0x6>

                        c1: R_386_PC32  ff_fft_end


And this is the same function if one uses -fvisibility=hidden instead of
the attribute:

000000bb <ff_rdft_end>:

   bb:  53                      push   %ebx

   bc:  e8 fc ff ff ff          call   bd <ff_rdft_end+0x2>

                        bd: R_386_PC32  __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx

   c1:  81 c3 02 00 00 00       add    $0x2,%ebx

                        c3: R_386_GOTPC _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_

   c7:  83 ec 14                sub    $0x14,%esp

   ca:  8b 44 24 1c             mov    0x1c(%esp),%eax

   ce:  83 c0 18                add    $0x18,%eax

   d1:  50                      push   %eax

   d2:  e8 fc ff ff ff          call   d3 <ff_rdft_end+0x18>

                        d3: R_386_PLT32 ff_fft_end

   d7:  83 c4 18                add    $0x18,%esp

   da:  5b                      pop    %ebx

   db:  c3                      ret


The code is the same as if one had not used -fvisibility=hidden at all.

Of course, adding the attribute to every function/object is way too much
effort; that's why the pragma exists.

Is this still true if you also add -fno-semantic-interposition?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to