Hi Caleb, There is a space missing in the commit message before "fast-fail".
Few minor comments below. Looks good otherwise -- it works as expected on an MXF file that contains JPEG 2000 Part 15 code-blocks. Looking forward to the full implementation! Best, -- Pierre On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 1:17 AM caleb <etemesica...@gmail.com> wrote: > > --- > This patch adds support for detecting Part 15 codeblocks to JPEG2000 > specified in (Rec. ITU-T T.814 | ISO/IEC 15444-15). > > The decoder on detecting Part 15 codeblocks now fails gracefully with a > AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME return code > > libavcodec/jpeg2000.h | 2 ++ > libavcodec/jpeg2000dec.c | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/jpeg2000.h b/libavcodec/jpeg2000.h > index d06313425e..e5ecb4cbf9 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/jpeg2000.h > +++ b/libavcodec/jpeg2000.h > @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ enum Jpeg2000Quantsty { // quantization style > #define JPEG2000_CSTY_PREC 0x01 // Precincts defined in coding style > #define JPEG2000_CSTY_SOP 0x02 // SOP marker present > #define JPEG2000_CSTY_EPH 0x04 // EPH marker present > +#define JPEG2000_CTSY_HTJ2K_F 0x40 // Only HT code-blocks (Rec. ITU-T > T.814 | ISO/IEC 15444-15) are present > +#define JPEG2000_CTSY_HTJ2K_M 0xC0 // HT code blocks (Rec. ITU-T T.814 | > ISO/IEC 15444-15) can be present > > // Progression orders > #define JPEG2000_PGOD_LRCP 0x00 // Layer-resolution > level-component-position progression > diff --git a/libavcodec/jpeg2000dec.c b/libavcodec/jpeg2000dec.c > index 92966b11f5..ef4a653afe 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/jpeg2000dec.c > +++ b/libavcodec/jpeg2000dec.c > @@ -521,6 +521,15 @@ static int get_cox(Jpeg2000DecoderContext *s, > Jpeg2000CodingStyle *c) > > c->cblk_style = bytestream2_get_byteu(&s->g); > if (c->cblk_style != 0) { // cblk style > + if (c->cblk_style & JPEG2000_CTSY_HTJ2K_M || c->cblk_style & > JPEG2000_CTSY_HTJ2K_F) { > + /* > + * HT code-blocks (Rec. ITU-T T.814 | ISO/IEC 15444-15) > bit-stream > + * Not yet supported in ffmpeg, cannot continue. The comment above can be removed since the av_log and return code are sufficiently descriptive. > + */ > + av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_FATAL, "Support for High throughput JPEG > 2000 is not yet available\n"); That should probably be AV_LOG_ERROR. > + return AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME; > + } > + > av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "extra cblk styles %X\n", > c->cblk_style); > if (c->cblk_style & JPEG2000_CBLK_BYPASS) > av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, "Selective arithmetic coding > bypass\n"); > -- > 2.34.0 > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".