As a gentle reminder, the Matroska specification can be commented on until the 22th of this month, so for another 7 days, before it is finalized and submitted to the IETF to start their review process. See the message below for details
> Op vr 1 apr. 2022 14:53 schreef Steve Lhomme <rob...@ycbcr.xyz>: >> >> On 2022-04-01 14:33, Steve Lhomme wrote: >> > Hi ffmmpeg developers, >> > >> > As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at >> > the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of >> > finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for >> > formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a >> > bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts >> > missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs. >> > >> > This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft >> > 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some >> > unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal >> > specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A. >> >> I forgot to mention you can reply here or on the GitHub repository of >> the specs [3] by creating an issue or even a Pull Request. >> >> [3] https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification >> >> > Thanks >> > >> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/ >> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/ Op za 2 apr. 2022 om 11:27 schreef Martijn van Beurden <mva...@gmail.com>: > > > There is also a HTML version of the draft available, which is perhaps easier > to read: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska-09.html > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
