On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:06:11PM +0100, tim nicholson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 21/05/15 11:59, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:00:56AM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote: > >> [..] > >> Why is this "guessing" code in mxfenc? This should be something that' > s > >> taken care of before calling any muxer (like in > >> avformat_write_header()), so everyone can benefit from it and so ther > e's > >> less risk of duplication when it's needed elsewhere. > >> > >> I've seen stunts like this pulled in more places than mxfenc, where > >> muxers will do dubious things like parse certain kinds of essence. I > am > >> not a fan. > > > > nor am i, ill try to move it into common code > > > > +1 to both your comments its why I have hesitated on some of the other > mxf metadata thats been requested.
change made patch applied thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws. -- Plato
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
