On Monday, 11 April 2022 at 05:15, "zhilizhao(赵志立)" wrote: > > On Apr 11, 2022, at 5:31 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > <domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > > > > Dear Developers! > > I'm curious about the warning about configuration mismatch between > > ff* binaries and the libraries introduced in: > > > > https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/ffmpeg.git/commit/9120e2cd3fadfa60269e94f97fc8107974c586fc > > [...] > > The idea is to have the builds differ by enabled codecs only and > > have the rest of the configuration the same (even if it's not the > > case today). > > > > So, does that warning still make sense today? Will something break > > if we swap the libraries but keep the binary on user systems? > > That’s exactly an example of why the warning is useful. Otherwise user > can be confused why some codecs are missing while banner says they are > enabled by configure. So yes, the warning still make sense.
Granted. > For the second question, I guess it may miss a few features depending > on the configuration. Try `grep CONFIG_ -r fftools/` and test. Thanks for the tip. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
