On 3/4/22, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12022-03-03): >> It is caused by number of sample per frame. >> >> I tested actually with -f lavfi -i sine only. >> >> And patch resolves issue. > > I do not doubt it does. But even without activate, EOF should not depend > on the number of samples per frame. There is something wrong going on > there, and I want to understand what before this change makes it go > away: otherwise, we might be missing other similar bugs. > > It has waited several months, a few days more will not hurt. >
No, wait must stop. The issue is that EOF is never reported if there is >1 frame left in queue before EOF for filters that do not use .activate (and use >1 inputs). > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
