On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> They all overflow in various samples that are considered valid input. I'm actually not sure about this last bit. I originally considered the samples "valid", but it looks like parts of the samples I was looking at are synthetic coefficient blocks, for which no defined output exists. So I may (subsets of) some of these patches in the future if I have time to analyze exactly what's going on in each of these... But short-term they should probably go in, a little slower and safe is better than ultra-fast and wrong. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel