On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> They all overflow in various samples that are considered valid input.


I'm actually not sure about this last bit. I originally considered the
samples "valid", but it looks like parts of the samples I was looking at
are synthetic coefficient blocks, for which no defined output exists. So I
may (subsets of) some of these patches in the future if I have time to
analyze exactly what's going on in each of these...

But short-term they should probably go in, a little slower and safe is
better than ultra-fast and wrong.

Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to