On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:54 AM Timo Rothenpieler <t...@rothenpieler.org> wrote:
> On 02.02.2022 01:50, Mark Gaiser wrote: > >> Ah, yeah. That's a very confusing side effect there. > >> I guess it's fine, but I can't say I like using it like that. > >> Since there's a large risk someone else might in the future think the > >> same and break it. > >> > > > > I'm fine changing it to someone that would feel more intuitive. > > Do you have a suggestion to make it better? > > Could just put a comment above explaining the reliance on the stripping > the full prefix. > Will do. Thanx! I'll wait for more feedback (if any) for a day or two before sending an updated patch. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
