On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:59:57PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:34:11AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:44:14AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> > > > --- > > > tests/fate-run.sh | 3 ++- > > > tests/fate/filter-video.mak | 4 ++-- > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-fieldmatch | 10 +++++----- > > > tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-pullup | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > > > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Hum, 5 frames test with telecine... I'd really go for more. > > ok, how many frames should we use ? >
Dunno, maybe 15 to 25. BTW, I have the feeling that 5 frames is not really enough for testing a some of the other filters as well. The first two things that come to my mind are: - the filters that rely on perms=random might not have enough coverage on the permissions - the filters that use video samples might not come across interesting/appropriate frames (whether it's based on the content or the properties of frames such as P/B/I for pp filters) Fortunately, pixfmts and video_filter command seems not used that much. -- Clément B.
pgpXaGZoTrKks.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
