On Sat, 9 May 2015 18:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:
> Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos <at> ag.or.at> writes: > > > > > + "Absolute path %s not tried for security reasons, " > > > > + "pass -use_absolute_path 1 to force using absolute paths\n", > > > Please suggest a wording that is also acceptable for > > library users (they can't guess "use_absolute_path" > > either I guess). > > Ping. > All users have to set the option to open such > files, if no other phrase is suggested, I'll > use the one above. > I suspect you would reject the wording needed for my own application. Why does ffmpeg.c get priority? Is libavformat not intended to be used by applications other than ffmpeg.c? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
