On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 11:20 AM Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 5:50 AM ffmpegagent <ffmpegag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's annoying and unexpected, but still useful at times (as I've realized
> > just recently).
> >
> > This is a follow-up to the earlier submission here:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org/msg128080.html
> >
> > There has been a comment from Anton, questioning whether the dump-feature is
> > useful. Meanwhile I came to the conclusion that it can be useful in-fact. It
> > just shouldn't happen automatically when DEBUG is defined. That's what these
> > patches do.
> >
> > I also added fixes for the fopen() call.
> >
> > softworkz (4):
> >   avcodec/dvbsubdec: don't dump images to disk based on DEBUG define
> >   avcodec/dvbsubdec: fix writing ppm
> >   avcodec/dvdsubdec: don't dump images to disk based on DEBUG define
> >   avcodec/dvdsubdec: fix writing ppm
> >
> >  libavcodec/dvbsubdec.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> >  libavcodec/dvdsubdec.c | 11 ++++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> >
>
> These patches need some squasing. It should've been obvious from them
> being duplicated.
>

Actually I fell into the dvb dvd trap, but regardless the patches are
basically identical, so I would still squash them, personally.

- Hendrik
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to