Michael Niedermayer:
> maintainer part inspired by IRC comments by lynne
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> ---
> doc/developer.texi | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
> index addee0d8263..eae3ade48a7 100644
> --- a/doc/developer.texi
> +++ b/doc/developer.texi
> @@ -683,6 +683,10 @@ are notoriously left unchecked, which is a serious
> problem.
> @item
> Test your code with valgrind and or Address Sanitizer to ensure it's free
> of leaks, out of array accesses, etc.
> +
> +@item
> +Changes to 2 libs which change both versions should be in 2 seperate patches.
^ ^
maybe spell this out a
(I presume that the pre- and post-release version bump patches are
supposed to be exempt from this?)
> +Non cosmetic changes to @file{MAINTAINERS} should not be in a patch with
> other changes.
> @end enumerate
>
> @chapter Patch review process
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
