wm4 <nfxjfg <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > As said, I had no objections against your patch (on > > the contrary) but I wonder why you want to set a field > > that is mostly useful when using libswscale if you > > don't use libswscale. > > Uh, what? > > Do you think libswscale is the only thing that > processes video?
No, but it seemed to me that this is what your commit message implied. > > > What is your opinion about this? > > > > I committed part of the change making gray full range... > > > > Whoever wants to use frame->data[0] should use it > > What do you even mean? I thought your question was "Do you agree that gray should be full-range?" Some people need the yuv -> gray conversion not to change the values, and I always wonder why they call libswscale in the beginning, instead of simply using the Y plane. > So what is the API user supposed to do? Special-case > by codec? Just what is it? How is this codec-related / when is gray not full-scale (and FFmpeg can know it)? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
