On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 15:32 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:31:40PM +0000, Soft Works wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Michael > > > Niedermayer > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 10:40 PM > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Haihao Xiang for > > > vaapi > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:16:16PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:39:40 +0000 > > > > "Eoff, Ullysses A" <ullysses.a.e...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have not seen any objections. > > > > > I just added Mark to CC using their email found on this ML. > > > > > Unfortunately, we don't have current email contact for > > > > > Gwenole (whom has not worked on ffmpeg for ~6 years). > > > > > Who else can make the approval, aside from the inactive people > > > > > previously listed? > > > > > > > > Are people reluctant to approve? > > > > > > I dont think so, iam just extra carefull as someone on IRC noticed that > > > "everyone and their grandmother who's worked for intel's got push access" > > > > > > There where also some complaints about code quality/cleanlyness > > > toward intels contributions > > > > That's true. There are differences, and my expressed support is > > specifically tied to the person, not about having just "somebody". > > > > I have my reservations about too early adoption of oneVPL and I think > > the patchset "Cleanup QSV Filters.." is doing too many things at once, > > but well - being a maintainer still doesn't mean that one could merge > > anything without consent. > > > > But the current situation, like having two or three people working full-time > > on the subject being depending on somebody who isn't following progress > > and unable assess, evaluate and test proposed changes is quite awkward. > > yes > > > > > > > So i just wanted to make sure there are no objections (iam not conciously > > > aware of any objections to these MAINTAINER additions ATM) > > > > > > > > > > I'll give it my approval to have on > > > > the record. If the old maintainers want to emerge from the woodwork and > > > > object after the fact, they are welcome to do so, but we can't just sit > > > > around indefinitely. > > > > I'm actually wondering, whether registered maintainers that do not > > respond anymore to contributions for a certain amount of time, > > shouldn't be unregistered automatically at some point? > > If they never react they should be removed when a new volunteer is added. > they should be informed about that when possible though. > Also when there is noone else, then listing the last maintainer even if > (s)he is mostly inactive still can make sense as it gives at least some point > of contact
Thanks all of you for your kink support. I'm glad to maintain vaapi plugin, will offer efforts to improve / enhance vaapi plugins and make it more useful to vaapi user. I'd appreciate it if someone could make the approval and apply this patch. Thanks Haihao _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
