On 12/13/2021 10:30 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting James Almer (2021-12-13 12:40:49)
On 12/13/2021 7:47 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Test for buf[0] rather than data[0] (which is broken for some hwaccel
formats).
---
   libavcodec/encode.c | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libavcodec/encode.c b/libavcodec/encode.c
index dd25cf999b..5575cf23db 100644
--- a/libavcodec/encode.c
+++ b/libavcodec/encode.c
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ int attribute_align_arg avcodec_send_frame(AVCodecContext 
*avctx, const AVFrame
       if (avci->draining)
           return AVERROR_EOF;
- if (avci->buffer_frame->data[0])
+    if (avci->buffer_frame->buf[0])

(avci->buffer_frame->buf[0] || (avci->buffer_frame->data[0]). Right now
you can pass it a non reference counted frame which will be made into
one by av_frame_ref() when stored in the encode context for processing,
which the doxy allows, and this patch as is will break it.

Will it? As you said - av_frame_ref() ensures buffer_frame is always
refcounted.

Oh, this is checking the already buffered frame, not the input one. Nevermind then.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to