On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 7:15 AM Soft Works <softwo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Good Morning, > > yesterday, it happened for the 4th and 5th times that another developer > called my patchset a “hack”. > > One time I didn’t ask, but in all other four cases I had distinctly and > insistingly asked for specifics about how the one has come to that > conclusion and what would be the reasons for considering the patchset > to be a “hack”. > > In none of the 4 cases, anybody was able to give even a single reason. > My assessment is that when a skilled developer is unable to explain > such opinions, these are possibly not one’s own opinions. Given that > it happened 5 times, that turns possibly into a “very likely” IMO. > > It makes me sad to see that seemingly somebody is doing politics > against my patchset behind the scenes. > > When there are others, thinking my patchset would be a “hack” but > cannot explain why – it might be time to get your own opinion. > subtitle_pts > > Kind regards, > softworkz > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
