Hi John-Paul, On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:22 PM John-Paul Stewart < jpstew...@personalprojects.net> wrote:
> On 2021-11-27 8:51 a.m., Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 4:52 PM John-Paul Stewart < > > jpstew...@personalprojects.net> wrote: > > > >> There were no single channel examples and no 8 bit > >> examples. > >> > >> I have created four clips with SGI's original 'moviemaker' utility (so > >> they are guaranteed to be correctly formatted) to reverse engineer those > >> two pieces of metadata since the format is largely undocumented. They > >> are under 1MB each and available at: > >> > > > > To prevent this from breaking in the future, it would be great if > > "as-small-as-possible" versions of these could be integrated into FATE > (our > > automated test system). How small can you make these so they still test > the > > bits-per-sample / channels features? > > I think they're already as small as I can practically make them. The > biggest is only 600 KiloBytes. In fact, my whole set of four is smaller > (2.0 MB) than the smallest existing test file (2.3 MB for 12345.mv) in > FATE's mv directory. > > In fact, the stereo16bit.movie example is redundant since there are > already samples with that combination. So you'd really only need about > 1.4 MB of new test files. > Alright. Would it be possible for you to submit a patch adding these other 3 samples to FATE then? Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
