On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:04 PM Anton Khirnov <an...@khirnov.net> wrote:
> Quoting Paul B Mahol (2021-11-19 14:55:42) > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 2:27 PM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:18:27PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > Quoting James Almer (2021-11-13 13:22:12) > > > > > Also, missing docs. > > > > > > > > Could we add a development rule that all new filters need docs and > all > > > > new filters/codecs/(de)muxers need a test (unless special > circumstances, > > > > like hwaccel)? > > > > > > Iam in favor of this > > > > > > > > Against this, as experimental filters does not need docs, > > I strongly disagree, even experimental code needs docs. I often find it > good idea to write documentation _before_ writing the code. > > Besides, experimental filters do not belong in the main repository. Keep > them in your tree until stop being experimental. > Never, I will keep posting filters without docs on devel mailing list as I wish. > > > floats too. > > This is an excuse, we have ways of dealing with floats. > Citations needed. > > -- > Anton Khirnov > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
